Language is a powerful tool that shapes our understanding of the world. The words we choose can either perpetuate stigma and exclusion or foster inclusivity and understanding. When it comes to menstruation, the language we use significantly impacts how society perceives this natural biological process. It’s time to shift from terms like “feminine hygiene products” to “period products,” and from “women and girls” to “individuals with periods.” Here’s why these changes matter—based on my experience as Executive Director of Free Flow NM, where we work to combat period poverty by distributing period products across Northern New Mexico.

1. Destigmatizing Menstruation
The term “feminine hygiene products” has been widely used for decades, but it carries connotations that perpetuate the idea that menstruation is unhygienic or dirty. This is misleading and contributes to the stigma surrounding periods. Menstruation is a natural biological process experienced by millions of people worldwide, not something that needs to be sanitized or hidden.

At Free Flow NM, we distribute period products to individuals of all ages, from young students to adults. We’ve seen firsthand how the language we use can affect the way people feel about their periods. Using the term “period products” helps normalize periods, reducing the shame and embarrassment often associated with them. It sends a message that periods are normal, and managing them with the right products is simply a part of life.

2. Inclusivity Matters
Another important aspect of using inclusive language is recognizing that not all individuals who menstruate identify as women. Transgender men, non-binary individuals, and genderqueer people may also experience periods. Using the term “feminine” excludes these groups, making them feel invisible and marginalized. It’s essential to adopt language that includes everyone who menstruates, regardless of their gender identity.

3. Accurate Data Representation
Using inclusive language also has practical implications, particularly when it comes to data collection and representation. Statements like “1 in 3 women miss school or work due to the lack of access to period products” can be misleading. Not all women menstruate ***provide examples – menopause, and menstruation is not limited to women alone. By saying “1 in 3 individuals with periods,” we provide a more accurate representation of those affected by menstruation-related issues.

Accurate data is crucial for developing policies and programs that effectively address the needs of people who menstruate. Using inclusive language ensures that no one is left out of conversations about menstrual health, education, and access to products. It allows us to better understand the scope of issues related to menstruation and to implement solutions that benefit everyone.

4. Empowering Young Menstruators
Another reason to move away from terms like “women with periods” is that menstruation often begins in childhood, with many individuals starting their periods as early as eight or nine years old. Referring to these young menstruators as “women” can feel inappropriate and even contribute to harmful societal practices that equate menstruation with readiness for marriage or adulthood. In my work, I do not consider an eight or nine-year-old to be a woman simply because they have started menstruating. Using terms like “individuals with periods” respects the developmental stage of young menstruators and avoids reinforcing stereotypes or cultural norms that could be detrimental to their well-being.

The language we use matters. By choosing terms that are inclusive and accurate, we can help break down the stigma surrounding menstruation, support gender diversity, and ensure that all individuals who menstruate feel represented and respected. Let’s start by making a conscious effort to use “period products” and “individuals with periods”—small changes that can make a big difference.